Prompt Details
Model
(claude-4-6-sonnet)
Token size
522
Example input
[TARGET COMPANY TYPE AND BUYER ROLE]: Mid-market e-commerce companies with 50 to 300 employees and 10M to 100M revenue, targeting VP of Operations or Head of Logistics
[YOUR PRODUCT OR SERVICE AND CORE VALUE]: ShipSmart logistics intelligence platform that connects to existing WMS and carrier accounts to reduce shipping costs by identifying carrier rate arbitrage and flagging suboptimal routing in real time
[SPECIFIC PROBLEM YOU SOLVE FOR THIS BUYER]: Operations leaders are overpaying shipping by 12 to 22 percent because carrier contracts were negotiated years ago and teams lack time to audit every shipment for routing errors and rate discrepancies
[PROOF POINTS CASE STUDIES OR SOCIAL PROOF]: Average customer saves 180k per year in year one, Apex Outdoor Gear saved 240k in 11 months, 94 percent of customers see ROI within 60 days, 3-week implementation with no disruption to existing systems
[SEQUENCE GOAL]: Book a 20-minute discovery call
Example output
EMAIL 1 — FIRST TOUCH
SEND TIMING: Day 1
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "Shipping costs — quick question"
Curiosity: "Most mid-market e-commerce companies don't know they're doing this"
Situational: "Something I noticed about how Apex Outdoor runs carrier routing"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
Most operations leaders I talk to at companies your size are overpaying shipping by 12-22% — not because they negotiated badly, but because carrier rates change quarterly and no one has time to audit every shipment.
We built a tool that catches this automatically. Average customer saves $180k in year one.
Worth a 20-minute call to see if the gap exists for you?
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: Opens with a specific, relatable problem framed as industry-wide — not a sales pitch. The specificity of "12-22%" and "$180k" signals this is data-backed, not generic, which earns credibility before asking for anything.
---
EMAIL 2 — FOLLOW-UP WITH NEW ANGLE
SEND TIMING: Day 3
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "The routing error you're probably not catching"
Curiosity: "One carrier setting that's quietly increasing your costs"
Situational: "What your WMS isn't telling you about carrier selection"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
One thing I didn't mention — the biggest source of overpayment isn't your carrier contract. It's routing errors: shipments going through a carrier that costs 18-30% more than your contracted alternative for that specific lane and weight class.
Your WMS won't flag this. We do.
Happy to show you what this looks like in practice — 20 minutes.
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: Introduces a specific, counterintuitive insight (the problem isn't the contract) that creates new urgency without repeating the first email. Positions the product as solving a problem they didn't know to look for.
---
EMAIL 3 — SOCIAL PROOF FOCUS
SEND TIMING: Day 7
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "Apex Outdoor saved $240k — how they did it"
Curiosity: "What happened when an outdoor gear company audited their carrier routing"
Situational: "Similar company, similar size — here's what we found"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
Apex Outdoor Gear — about your size, similar carrier mix — ran our audit last year. Found $240k in annual overpayment in the first two weeks. Implemented in 3 weeks with no disruption to their existing WMS.
Their VP of Ops said it was the easiest ROI they'd seen in years.
I'm not sure if the same opportunity exists for you, but it's a 20-minute call to find out.
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: Uses a specific, comparable customer story that makes the abstract benefit concrete. "I'm not sure if the same opportunity exists for you" reduces pressure while implying there's a real question worth answering.
---
EMAIL 4 — PATTERN INTERRUPT
SEND TIMING: Day 12
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "Honest question"
Curiosity: "Is this the wrong time, or the wrong message?"
Situational: "Still thinking about carrier costs?"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
Three emails in and no reply — which usually means one of three things:
1. Shipping costs aren't a priority right now
2. You're already solving this
3. My emails aren't making the case well enough
Which one is it? One line is fine.
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: Breaks the one-way communication pattern by naming the silence directly and offering three plausible explanations — one of which is self-critical. Invites a very low-effort reply and often surfaces the real objection.
---
EMAIL 5 — BREAKUP EMAIL
SEND TIMING: Day 18
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "Last email from me"
Curiosity: "One thing before I go"
Situational: "Closing the loop on carrier costs"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
Last email — I won't keep following up.
Before I go: if you ever want to audit your carrier routing, the fastest way to start is to pull your last 90 days of shipment data and look at the variance between contracted rate and actual rate per lane. Most teams find something interesting in 30 minutes.
If the timing is ever right, you know where to find me.
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: Ends the sequence with dignity and a genuine gift — a concrete, actionable tip they can use without buying anything. This approach often generates more replies than any previous email because it removes all pressure and leaves the prospect with a positive impression.
---
BONUS — REACTIVATION EMAIL
SEND TIMING: 60-90 days after original sequence ended, if they previously engaged (opened, replied, or clicked)
SUBJECT LINE OPTIONS:
Direct: "Circling back — still relevant?"
Curiosity: "Something's changed since we last talked"
Situational: "Q4 shipping season coming — worth revisiting?"
EMAIL BODY:
Hi Sarah,
We talked briefly a few months back about carrier routing costs. I'm reaching back out because Q4 tends to surface the routing inefficiency problem more visibly — higher volume, faster decisions, less time to catch errors.
If it's a better time to look at this, I'm happy to pull a quick audit on your shipping data. No setup required.
[Name]
PERSUASION STRATEGY: References the prior interaction to establish familiarity, then uses a timely external trigger (Q4 volume) to make reconnecting feel relevant rather than opportunistic. Offers a low-friction starting point.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-4-6-SONNET
Generic cold emails get deleted. This Claude prompt builds a complete 5-touch cold email sequence for any B2B target — with a tailored first touch, follow-up angles that add new value each time, a breakup email that often gets replies, and a reactivation email for dead leads. Each email includes subject line options, the email body, and the underlying persuasion strategy. Works for sales teams, SDRs, founders doing outbound, and agencies prospecting for clients.
...more
Added 2 days ago
